‘The Lottery’ Response

Rating: 5 out of 5.

Let me start with a quick note: for those of you who’ve stumbled upon this post and are not here from my Genres class, I recommend you read the short story ‘The Lottery’ by Shirley Jackson. It is linked here for your convenience.

This town is a close-knit community. While they boast significant growth as one of the reasons for their adaptations of the lottery rituals. However, they have intimate knowledge of each other’s lives, so much so that when Mr. Summers asks if anyone was yet to arrive, the townspeople immediately know not only is Mr. Dunbar missing, but he has a broken leg.

“Well, now,” Mr. Summers said soberly, “guess we better get started, get this over with, so’s we can go back to work. Anybody ain’t here?”

“Dunbar,” several people said. “Dunbar, Dunbar.”

Mr. Summers consulted his list. “Clyde Dunbar,” he said. “That’s right. He’s broke his leg, hasn’t he? Who’s drawing for him?”

Shirley Jackson, The Lottery

The lottery drawing has incredible significance. The townspeople gather together to partake in the event, and ridicule the northern village who has plans to give up the practice.

The first half of the story frames the lottery as a positive thing. In fact, simply calling it a lottery insinuates there is something to be gained from it. This particular framing is done away with once the Hutchinson family is revealed to have been chosen. Reactions from the crowd now indicate the lottery is something you don’t want, with one person trying to give reason to let him draw again.

My jaw dropped as soon as I read the section where characters select stones to throw at Tessie Hutchinson. This story presumably takes place in rural America, and likely in the past. Even then, I had to ask myself how such a practice would arise and continue for many years. Could it simply be in an effort to reduce the number of mouths to feed? I found this hard to believe considering a capitalist society like the United States is based on the principle that those who have money can buy necessities, while those not so fortunate are often left behind.

Short Stories Analyzed: The Lottery Character Analysis
Tessie Hutchinson is given the piece of paper with a black dot, and is thus stoned to death

There is no semblance of a governmental system; in fact, Mr. Summers seems to have the most authority there out of anyone. The crowd operates with a sort of mob mentality, taking what the piece of paper with a black dot says as the final word and silencing Mrs. Hutchinson’s cries of protest.

This story has a powerful message, I’m just not sure if I know what it is yet.

3 thoughts on “‘The Lottery’ Response

  1. Long time, no writing…Kiran’s back! I read The Lottery on your recommendation and it was ritualistic and a little strange…kind of like The Purge but with a different twist. I look forward to hearing your interpretation soon and sharing mine with you.

  2. Hmmmm…. I take away from it the importance of rituals in this particular society (and perhaps all societies for that matter). The whole processes described are very ritualistic, rote in nature, and seems to have gone on for as long as anyone can remember, and then some. But why, for what purpose? Once a year end singling out an individual – and stoning them-to death? I agree there’s something powerful being conveyed-perhaps we need to give it more thought and analysis to understand what…

  3. It’s so great to see your writing again after a long while! I look forward to reading the short story and it’s entirety. Please keep writing often!

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s